Specialized service to respond to reviewer 2 when they ask for statistical analyses you don't master: multivariate regression, sensitivity, alternative models. Response letter drafted and revised manuscript in 48-72h. By project, no hourly fee.
I help you respond to reviewer 2 point by point, with the reanalyses done
The reviewer demands a multivariate analysis, a logistic regression, a sensitivity test or an alternative model you don't handle, and the major revision deadline is closing in. I run the additional analyses and help you draft the response letter point by point. Turnaround: 48-72h from receiving manuscript and data.
If you've been turning over the response letter for days, this is the exact moment this service is most useful.
Multivariate logistic regression, mixed models, mediation with bootstrap, outlier sensitivity, equivalence with TOST… The reviewer treats it as standard and you've never done it.
Your supervisor signed the manuscript but the response letter and reanalyses are on you. One mistake here and the journal definitively rejects.
You have 4-6 weeks and between teaching, patients and other projects you can't spend 80 hours learning a new method. You need someone to do it well and fast.
Not "see if you find something": you come with concrete reviewer requests and I execute and argue them.
Adjusted regressions, sensitivity with/without outliers, alternative models, multiple comparisons, cross-validation: what the reviewer asks.
Every reviewer comment with its response, citing the change in the manuscript (page/line) and the result of the additional analysis.
If you need a table with adjusted results or an extra figure (forest plot, Bland-Altman, ROC curve), delivered ready to insert.
When the reviewer asks for something that isn't the best option for your data, I help you argue why your approach is defensible: with citations and reasoning.
If after your response the reviewer comes back with more requests, we continue together until the editor's final decision.
When the reviewer asks for the entire analysis to be redone with a different approach, I cover that too: with a separate fixed-price proposal.
No clock running on your tab. When you send the reviewer letter and your manuscript, I send a fixed price within 24h: no inflated hours while you wait. Before delivery, every additional analysis goes through a careful review on my side: I rerun the code, re-check the assumptions and verify coherence with your original manuscript line by line. That's what I obsess over in a reviewer response: that the revised version you submit is clean and holds up to a second round. The clock here runs against the journal's deadline, not against your invoice.
Attach or paste the reviewer's letter, tell me which phase you are in and the major revision deadline. Within 24h you receive a tentative proposal with timeline and fixed price.
Biostatistics and statistical consulting for health research · All services
It happens more than people think: some reviewer comments on statistics are debatable. The right response isn't automatic compliance, it's arguing why that analysis doesn't apply to your design and proposing the alternative that does address their concern. I help you draft that justification with bibliographic backing.
48-72h from receiving manuscript + data + reviewer letter, for bounded analyses (1-3 additional analyses). If the reviewer asks for full reanalysis, the timeline is set at the start. I tell you clearly in the 24h proposal.
Better. We work as three: you give me study context, your supervisor validates the methodological approach, I execute. The response letter is signed by you with your supervisor: I don't appear, nor do I expect to. It's methodological service.
Yes. I send NDA if needed, explain how to pseudonymize data before sending and delete it after the project. Confidentiality is mandatory, not optional.
Psychology (my main background), medicine, nursing, physiotherapy, dentistry and sport science. The techniques reviewers ask for are the same: domains and vocabulary vary.